IT’S TRUE

It’s true that I keep track. I have kept track since I was a girl, and I am officially an old woman now . . . so it’s been a long time. I have noticed for at least fifty years. I stay for the credits in films and search for women among the crew. I count who is asked to comment and what percentage of teams on news programs and Boards of Directors are male and female, white and people of color. I look at the genders of the people thanked in author’s acknowledgements. I count whose books are reviewed and by whom. When I went to the Faculty room at my local high school where I taught for 30 years, one table was crowded around by men, and women were not welcome at that table—seriously. I tried. I complained about this for years, literally years. Recently I said out loud in that lunch room, to the only other person at my table (a woman), that I planned to take a photo. I called the situation a “toxic work environment.” One of the men immediately suggested to administrators that maybe it was not right the way men crowded around one table and ignored the women in the room. Now there is a brand new, long narrow table, forcing everyone to sit at one table. This has, sadly, come far too late to address the “good old boy” atmosphere at this school.

Years ago, when the football, cross country, and volleyball coaches refused to allow formation of a soccer team, I was the one who suggested to a class of seniors: One of you must have a parent who is buddies with a school board member . . . and there was a soccer team.

It didn’t seem fair to expect the girls’ softball team to perform all maintenance on their frequently-flooded field while the boys’ baseball team had a brand new, non-flooding facility. And there was a lawsuit, but not until after several people tried to reason this out with those in power and were blown off. My sympathies were less with my employers than with the girls, who had for years dealt with the situation.

So, yes, I am one of those people on the side of the underdog, one of those people who keeps track. I notice when all the people in a room are white. I notice when only men populate a Congressional panel on women’s health. I notice when the only female person on a film crew is the “script girl.” And I notice when only men get book reviews. As Editor of the New York Times Review of Books and a woman, I might have hoped for better from that editor, but all the books recommended today are by men. One of the men is Mexican American (reviewed by a Vietnamese-American man). The illustration and one of the reviewers are women. Not enough. Not nearly enough!

Do better, please. I cannot believe that only men’s stories were published recently. I cannot believe that any special effort is required to ensure that there is some representation of the broad diversity of experience and perspective within our literature. The illustration below suggests that we all sit at the same table. I would like that to be true.

What came in an email:

Dear Reader… 
<nil>
Marta Monteiro
Our editors are enthusiastic about Luis Alberto Urrea’s new novel, “The House of Broken Angels” — as is our reviewer, Viet Thanh Nguyen, who writes: “The quips and jokes come fast through a poignant novel that is very much about time itself, especially the passing of time and the inevitability of death.”
Both Easter and Passover fall on this weekend. So Jon Meacham looks at changing perceptions of the resurrection story throughout history. Michael Massing’s new book, “Fatal Discord,” studies the relationship between Martin Luther and Desiderius Erasmus. And Simon Schama reviews Jonathan Weisman’s new book about being Jewish in the age of Trump.
Also inside, C.E. Morgan, author of the acclaimed 2016 novel “The Sport of Kings,” reviews Ulrich Raulff’s new cultural history, “Farewell to the Horse.” And those eagerly anticipating Steven Spielberg’s latest movie, “Ready Player One,” can enjoy the By the Book interview with Ernest Cline, author of the novel on which it’s based.
Lastly, do you love Grant Snider’s book comics as much as we do? His latest, “Whenever, Wherever,” is close to my heart. You can check out his other work here.
As always, let me know what you think – about this newsletter, our reviews, our podcast or what you’re reading. You can email me at books@nytimes.com and even if it takes me weeks to write back (I confess it probably will) I’m reading and thinking about your feedback.
Pamela Paul
Editor of The New York Times Book Review
@PamelaPaulNYT

SHORTLISTED update: ACCEPTED!

wood2

A story I am particularly proud of is “shortlisted”—that is, the editors told me they liked it and wanted to hold it longer—with a paying online journal. This particular story had been shortlisted three times before, each time by a journal that pays professional rates and does not allow simultaneous submissions. As a result it has been held for months, and then rejected three times already. It is sad for me to recognize how long ago I first drafted this story.

I desperately want a journal to publish this story. Three well-published literary friends have read it and helped me revise. The editors of this current journal said they would get back to me with a decision by the end of February. It is now the end of March.

To say I am anxious would be understating my feelings about publication of this story. Fourth time’s the charm? I don’t want editors to lower their standards for my story. I want them to love it as much as I do. They see a lot of great work. I want mine to belong to that rare group. I could save myself a lot of pain if I could lower my own standards. I could send it to smaller, nonpaying markets. I could send it to minor journals that have asked for my work. But it feels to me like an important story, a great story with an impact I will never replicate. Or is it merely a good story that is simply never going to be good enough? I really cannot say.

I read a lot, and I am pretty sure I know what my favorite journals are really, really looking for. It is not my story. I recognize the quirkiness of my story’s genre, which is mildly disturbing but not disturbing enough to be classified as horror. It is fantastic, but not in the conventional way that immediate labels a story fantasy. It’s not realist fiction or SF. It has humor but is not a comedy.

“If It Were True Owls Dream” is an odd, amusing, and somewhat unsettling short story in need of a home. It felt like magic when the first draft arrived. I need a little publication magic right about now.

I worked on a recent story and committed to work during April on another.

30 March 2018 update: Liminal Stories has accepted “If It Were True Owls Dream” for their summer issue! And it arrived in the same emailing—or in my same reading—as acceptance of a true story by Brevity and a request for a full manuscript by an agent I have been interested in for a long time. We had gone to Canada for a few days without internet and came home to all this wonderful news.

“Thank you for sending ‘If It Were True Owls Dream’ to Liminal.  We love it and would be pleased to accept it for publication. We were drawn in by the strong voice of the piece and found it wonderfully engaging and unusual.”

SHOCKING PINK

IMG_2120

I had been reading The Feminine Mystique by Betty Friedan in the bright pink paperback cover before my drawing class started at 7:30 in the morning. My instructor began screaming at me that the book had ruined his best friend’s marriage.

Somehow I knew, without knowing, that there had been some other reasons for the breakup. But I was young and small and female. I knew enough not to argue that day.

It was only my second term at the University of Washington, winter of 1971, when I arrived early for Art 111, the second in a studio drawing series required of all art majors. I had already been chewed out for humming and for missing a class due to snow (the busses did not run within two miles of my house and my ride went in late that day). I waited on a drawing bench, my large portfolio propped at the end and ready to go once class started. When my professor charged into the room, I stuck a bookmark in my book I had been reading and set it aside.

I was not quick enough.

He spotted the paperback book beside my hand and asked me, “Do you believe all that?” The pink cover was unmistakable.

“Yes, I do,” I said, well aware this was not the right answer.

“That book cost my best friend his marriage,” he said. He then reviewed details of his friend’s private life that I immediately forgot, his voice rising as he went along. It would not be the last time I would be yelled at by a man standing over me, insisting that men were being treated unfairly.

“One and a half million copies in print” my bright pink 1970 Dell paperback says on the cover. The dedication is to Friedan’s husband and children.

That book has been on my shelves ever since, and though the spine has sun-faded, the front cover is still shocking pink and that color was a statement in its day. Pink for girls—that pink inspired by an outsized diamond introduced on a perfume bottle in 1937 as “shocking pink” by fashion designer Elsa Schiaparelli. We called that shocking color “hot pink” sometimes, bright, the vibrant pink of bougainvillea and drag racer Shirley Muldowney’s car, the color striped on my purple Cher-designed bell bottoms when I was fourteen, a color that could hurt your eyes if you stared too long. In some European languages such as German, the word pink is not pale red, the color called “rosa”, but this particular intense pink, this intense leaning-toward magenta shocking pink is the only “pink”.

6dccee3524f3a67b84920ade2b114e37.jpg

Model Guinevere Van Seenus wears Schiaparelli’s shocking-pink dress (fall 1937) in the May issue of Vogue.

Shocking? Betty Friedan’s book, originally published in 1963, revealed what was happening to women in middle America after the Second World War, after Rosie the Riveter was sent home from factories to make room for returning veterans. As Americans moved into the suburbs, women went back to suburban and now isolated kitchens, married younger, had more babies, enjoyed the modern conveniences of automatic appliances, and yet they were not happy. The grocer, the baker, and even the candlestick maker were a car ride away and chances are, that wife didn’t have a car—only about 15% did by 1960 when my mother was responsible for two elementary-age children. Opportunities for women outside the home had actually deteriorated during the twentieth century. Schools for women still focused on the domestic arts, and women were warned that ambitions beyond their immediate family were a threat to peaceful society.

The cover of Friedan’s book was not just pink for girls, it was shocking pink, a color that warned it was starting something, a new look at women and their place in society, their need to find a place of meaning and purpose beyond marriage and parenting.

Friedan was among the first to utilize Maslow’s hierarchy of needs when she described how society was deliberately limiting women’s role to their sexuality. Gender alone as destiny.

Until the post-war period, pink was not even considered the color of little girls. In fact, earlier in the twentieth century, no one considered the gender of young children to be an issue at all. In England, if pink was deliberately chosen for a baby or young child, it was generally for a boy since red was the color of military uniforms and boys are pale versions of what they will become. Pink was not then a baby girl color; pale blue was not the color of little boys. Children were not thought to be sexual entities. Regardless of sexuality, the enforced split into girly pink and baby-boy blue does not seem to have been good for girls. (It hasn’t done the boys much good either.) Today entire toy departments are sometimes divided into the blue section with boy toys and the pink section confined to girls’ toys.

Nevertheless, the nearly two hundred year old American clothing manufacturer Brooks Brothers still offers thirty-three dress shirts in pink but only twenty-four in white and four in green, in addition to the most popular blue. Pink shirts are reputed to soften the impact of dark suits and sport coats in charcoal, navy, and black. The pale pink is tinted warm toward yellow or cool toward blue in order to complement skin tones.

Pink as a color name is nearly unique in that for many people it is a distinct color, not a tint or lighter version of red, but a color all on its own. Orange, green, purple, blue, and even yellow are described as light or dark, but add white to red, and it becomes another something not called light red, but pink.

The color illicits intense emotional responses. It is the color of the triangles labeling gay men during the Nazi era and today worn as a symbol of gay pride. It is currently one granddaughter’s favorite color. The older granddaughter likes blue, but before blue, she favored pink too. Before pink she loved yellow, and purple might be the approaching favorite. But for now, the younger granddaughter wears shocking pink whenever possible: pink pants, pinks dresses and nighties. She is not yet two.

In English, most people would have no hesitation calling anything from a dark navy to a light baby blue, blue. Even in the gem trade, all blue sapphires of any intensity, light or dark, are called blue. The same is not true for red sapphires.

My older granddaughter’s name is Ruby, the name of a gemstone that is always red. Rubies are corundum, the same gem as a blue sapphire, and both colors can sometimes be found in the same crystal, blue at one end, red at the other. Sapphires can be many colors other than blue, any color really—orange, yellow, green, violet. Only when sapphires are red are they called rubies, and when they are a pale red they are no longer rubies, they are pink sapphires in the United States. This is a relatively recent distinction. Where the gems are mined in Asia, all the reddish stones are rubies. The “riper” red ones most desirable, but the rich pink stones are favored in some nations. In some languages there are names for paler tints of blue, to distinguish them from saturations. There is even a more specific name for some sapphires. I would call the padparadscha sapphire a tropical fruit color, a rich orangey-red, but the name comes from the lotus flower. It is an especially desirable color.

Red and pink diamonds remain the rarest and command the highest prices for any gemstones. The highest price ever paid for a diamond was the vivid pink 5-carat stone sold for nearly eleven million dollars a few years ago, the inspiration for Schiaparelli’s shocking pink.

Pink today represents our tenderest emotions in English. The use of pink in clothing and decaration to denote specifically a girl child is a result of this recent prejudice. Wikipedia insists that the color name, pink, comes from a flower. The clove pinks (Dianthus caryophyllus) of my childhood were a low-growing plant with pale pink flowers standing above the foliage and having a distinctive and intense clove scent. It is worth noting that the name of the species, Dianthus, is derived from the words for “divine” and “love”. The stage name Pink refers to singer Alecia Beth Hart. Her professional name might be from her favorite color or a character in a movie (Mr. Pink in Reservoir Dogs), because she’s pink in private places—as we all are—or because she blushed a lot as a child. Does it matter? Pink can refer to sexuality and heat, but more often innocence.

There is safety in pink. Press a thumb on the gums of a person to observe how quickly the gum tissue returns to dark pink. A healthy vascular system replenishes color almost immediately. Pink is the color of health—though pink cheeks are never the pink found highlighting the cheeks of a porcelain doll, regardless of basic skin tone. Pink flushes the cheeks of every person, of any skin. It is also the color found in inflected eyes and the insides of shells, but blood stains wash out brown, not pink, and pink comes in many shades. What a confusion of color.

The cult classic, Pretty in Pink, concerns a girl trying hard to be something that others will admire. It is the color of newborns of many species regardless of adult fur, hair, feathers or skin color. Infancy to innocence in a single generation. By the 1950s, pale pink was the color most associated with fluffy sweaters and full skirts, with little girls and demur ladies with hands neatly folded in their laps.

By the second half of the last century, women grew tired of being always ladylike and supportive and silent. The watered-down tint that suited Maimie Eisenhauer no longer satisfied. According to a Life magazine blurb on the back cover of Friedan’s book: “Angry and thoroughly documented . . . it is going to provoke the daylights out of almost everyone.” Yes, pretty in pink, but also politically awake if we are told that passivity is the extent of our future.

It is never too late to become shocking with pink.

 

SaveSave

MY NOVEL

cropped-img_2225.jpg

My query-letter pitch:

Imperfect Patience*, a literary novel of about 76k words, follows a woman’s odyssey beyond grief. It is a novel of love overwhelming adversity.

Thena Justice was building a new life near Seattle after the death of her mother and breakup of a terrible marriage when her former husband murders the neighbor-babysitter and their daughter before committing suicide. Lost in grief and guilt, Thena first hides in a friend’s converted garage, then in a tiny cottage on the Pacific coast, thrashing her way through anguish, apathy, anger, and routine. Instead of returning to Puget Sound, she moves to Portland, Oregon, the city where she was born, takes the bus to a retail job each day, and keeps her head down until a child crying in the night wakens her sense of agency and hope.

My work has earned an Oregon Literary Arts Fellowship, Arts & Letters fellowship, Soapstone residency, Pushcart nomination, and publication in journals such as the Brevity blog, The MacGuffinCALYXThe HumanistNorth American Review, and anthologies on running and race. I have BFAs in studio arts, and an MFA in fiction from Pacific University. I live and teach in the NW corner of my home state of Oregon. My house has been home to six generations of my family, which like most has seen its share of tragedy.

I have written the novel I searched for when I faced my own life troubles, a story proving the pathway back from unimaginable loss. Women, especially, do this all the time. I have little faith in fairytale romance, but I do believe in grit, I believe in recovery, and I believe in love. I believe stories can sometimes save us.


Currently, I am writing nonfiction and science fiction, but later this year I will begin revising another realist novel—a completed draft that will go through several more drafts. You can also read more about revision.

*I have gone through several titles (at least five). If someone decides to represent this novel, perhaps they will help me name it too.

#FACEBOOK

Pendiri-WhatsApp-Dukung-Gerakan-DeleteFacebook.jpg

My husband and I don’t do Twitter. I have a Pinterest account, but no one in our family does the other social media. But for nine or ten years, maybe longer, I was on Facebook. I had over 1600 “friends.” They are actual friends, family, former students, former classmates, artists and writers.

I began phasing out use of my Facebook account early last summer. I nearly deleted my account this winter, but changed my mind at the last moment. I figure most people do that—change their minds. It’s hard to let go. I deactivated my account months ago and I did not exist on FB just now, at least as far as I knew. I had been afraid to check. FB will turn your account back on if you access it, even accidentally. That happened several times a few months ago.

So this is it, folks, I am back to thinking about deleting my account permanently. Or not.

I was fully aware of what I was getting into when I joined. The ads at the side made clear to me that Facebook was selling information. I found promoted stories in my feed every day. During the 2016 election campaign, I found horrible stuff in my feed and told it to go away. It did go away. I am not a good customer for conspiracy theories and wackjob political stories. I verify facts.

So now that everyone is a little hysterical, I can’t help feeling terribly disappointed in those 50 million accounts that were hacked. But my disappointment is not with Facebook—which is only trying to make a buck (or a few billions)—but with users who read the ridiculous trash on Facebook and apparently shared it. Facebook isn’t a site created in order to allow us to communicate with people we like. It was created to make a profit. Those ads on the sides were not a clue? The crazy “promoted” stories didn’t tip people off?

Yes, my schizophrenic relative believes Michelle Obama is a transvestite. Another believes in Obama’s death camps. The “Lock her up!” line was the favorite of many people who seem not to have noticed that their darling Trump has now, genuinely, done all the things we were supposed to lock her up for.

(Remember those crimes that were supposed to make us angry at Hillary?—Wall Street connections, private email servers, questionable charity?—those are Trump stories, my friends. The White House cabinet is stacked with Wall Street people; Trump’s family—I had to define “nepotism” for my seniors last month—members use private email servers in the White House; and only a lout like Trump would use his charity to purchase an enormous portrait for his golf course club house, a portrait of himself.)

I read the news every morning. I know more about what is going on than the latest shooting. I read science stories, political stories, art stories. I double check stories.

I trust (and so can you) any story that is covered by The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Guardian, and NPR. If I want a more conservative slant, I check The Wall Street Journal, The Hill, and The Christian Science Monitor. If I want a more liberal slant, I check Mother Jones or even The Nation. If I don’t want to read opinions, I don’t have to. I can stick to straight news. I can even check the news wire services who supply facts to everyone: the AP and Reuters.

Many of the stories I found on Facebook over the years, including on the pages of people I like, were nonsense—total trash and nonsense, some outright propaganda and a lot of irrational scare tactics. I mostly ignored those stories. Sometimes they made me angry. Sometimes the juxtaposition of someone I liked spouting nonsense disturbed me so much I could barely stand to be on Facebook.

It’s why I left.

However, even if I don’t miss Facebook, I do miss my people.

So there is my problem, or problems: I miss my peeps, I miss the family posts and news of former students, the art and writing news of friends. I miss sharing what I am doing each day. I miss posting news of my posts here on my Facebook page. I’d like to think I might have a book to promote on Facebook some day, and I would like to be able to do it.

Like everyone, I would like to boast about what makes me proud—recent publications, beach finds, grandchildren . . . on Facebook.

It would be ironic, wouldn’t it, if I returned to Facebook just as everyone else leaves?

HOW TO REVISE

IMG_4911

The process of sending written work—stories, essays, poems—to editors and agents who represent authors’ work is called “submission.”

Just now, I am submitting a complete novel.

The novel concerns a women who marries unwisely, suffers mightily, and must find a way to remake her life. It might sound like a metaphor for my writing life.

It is not.

It is the fullest expression I have managed of my faith in the ability of the human soul to overcome adversity. This is because I do not believe anyone gets through life without suffering.

Gary taught our granddaughter an exchange: He says, “We’re all gonna die!” and she responds, “No, we’re just going to suffer.” And then they both laugh like idiots.

Writing and submitting is like that, too.

The first draft of this novel (my fifth) was about 77k words, the second draft was longer. I cut and rewrote and it got much longer—more than 81k—and then for the 4th draft I deleted nearly all the backstory about how my main character got herself into the initial mess of estrangement from her family and a bad marriage. I am not actually very interested in how people get into messes. I think most of us don’t see them coming. I think most of the terrible events we must overcome could not have been avoided. Avoiding trouble isn’t the issue—there is always unavoidable trouble. The trick is surviving.

I wrote a book about overcoming trouble, not about getting into trouble. \

So I wrote, rewrote, read the manuscript aloud to my husband, sent it to a friend who writes YA (young adult) books, sent it to a smarter friend who is an academic and a good reader. I read it again. I changed the title seven or eight times. At draft nine I began submitting. Gary just read it again, and his reading was smart and helpful. After his input, I restructured the chapters because I wanted 24 chapters instead of 33. This is now draft 10. No one has actually read the novel as it stands. Except me and mostly Gary.

I have written a synopsis of four double-spaced pages, a version of that synopsis on two double-spaced pages, a version that is 500 words, and a version that is 300 words. I have written a query letter that accompanies my submission. In fact the query letter is all that most agents read.

In the past, my work has been criticized for being “too quiet” or lacking in plot. My query letter suggests, in an even more brief summary, that a great deal happens in this novel. There is death and loss and overwhelming grief. All this is true, but I may have gone overboard. One agent wrote back the yesterday, someone I know through another writer, and

“I read this query letter, it’s thoughtful and well-written. I don’t, however, have the mental energy to read a novel of this description, the world has become such a violent and angry place, I find myself unwilling to read fiction which deepens that impression.

“I’m sure there are others who will disagree with me and toward that end, best of luck . . .

So I went back to my query letter to undo some of the negativity. In the mean time, I had sent that unfortunate letter, submitted it, to a dozen agents. It is too late to take them all back. I want to rewrite the query as well as the novel. (Though, to be fair to myself, that letter was rewritten more than a dozen times.) I changed the title again.

I lie awake at night and think through this novel I am submitting; how the story began with an experience in my freshman year of college; how I first tried to write it and that story gained my admittance to a Masters of Fine Arts program in writing; how I recognized that the flaw of the short story was that it was meant to be a novel; how more and more this work of fiction details the truest events in my life; how I originally wrote about my character’s unhappy marriage; and how I cut dozens of pages because that unhappiness didn’t matter. Marriages are sometimes unhappy. I wanted to write more about what comes after.

Several days ago, a woman stopped me on the beach to ask what I was doing. “Mostly picking up trash.” I had a handful of plastic. She was a retired teacher and we commiserated for some time on the poor quality of writing instruction. We talked for a long time and I told her I wrote.

“Are you published?”

I said, “Oh, yes.”

But non-writers do not know how little that means. I have published essays and poems and even stories. I am in books. None of this matters very much except to me. It is not significant. I told her I was waiting to hear about a story, that the magazine liked it but accepted no more that 0.2% of the hundreds of story sent to them.

“Why not send it to somebody else?”

And right there is the catch. Yes, some journals publish more of what is submitted than others. But I want to be accepted by better journals. I want to fly up there overhead. And that requires that I write and revise, and then take my chances submitting. It means a lot of rejection.

Submit to the market. Submit to the inevitable. Submit. It sounds like a sort of violation.

Submitting work to a stranger is not a violation; it is an act of faith that someone I do not know will read and value a story that I needed very much to write.

That is simply the truth.

I found a piece of blue-green sea glass the other morning and a smooth flat pebble spotted green. I held them tight in my hand while I talked to the retired 2nd grade teacher whose grandson attends a private school in Seattle and does not know how to revise.

I held color in my hand and then after I came home I spread my novel all over the floor in order to complete this revision.

 

 

TWO WEEKS

IMG_4419 - Version 2

My mother died in 2007. In 2002 when I was on the other side of the country at a writing workshop, Mom drove the two blocks to the Post Office and realized she was unable to get out of her car. Over the next five years, Mom had surgeries, falls, and was in and out of hospitals, assisted living, and nursing care. She would get home for a few days or a few weeks and then would be back in care.

During most of those years, Gary and I were here primary caregivers. We took her to the ER a dozen times, maybe twenty times. We made her coffee, we cleaned her house, we took her to appointments. We sat and talked. Particularly when she was trying to manage at home, we each stopped by several times a day. One notable weeks I had parents conferences and Mom went to the ER three times. She refused to move in with us.

One earnest colleague suggested at lunch that if Gary and I stopped doing everything for her, perhaps my mother would do more for herself. I had been moaning about Mom’s stubbornness and our exhaustion. We were not enabling her, but to someone who has not had that experience of caregiving, my complaints must have sounded petty. We did more and more as Mom had more and more trouble negotiating the ten feet between bed and bathroom, bathroom and her favorite living room chair, that chair and bed. It was emotionally distressing, physically exhausting for al of us.

I am a writer and reader, so by the end of 2002 I was looking for help in books. I found several memoirs about caring for a dying parent. The experience was uplifting, a reconciliation, sometimes even declared “beautiful.” These observations came from people who cared for their parent in the final hours or days or weeks of life. None of them involved months of care or a patient who refused to follow the advice of doctors, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists. What they had to say did not seem relevant to me.

I recall sitting in my house, upstairs near a window facing west, when I finally found a book addressing the needs of caregivers—family and friends helping someone to manage basic activities. It might have been a nurse who wrote that book. One chapter was given over to recognizing when a caregivers were in over their heads. There was a checklist.

We were drinking every night when it felt possible to do so, we did not sleep well, we had trouble talking to others about our experience. We were afraid to travel outside the county. The book suggested that if a caregiver checked more than one or two boxes, additional held was needed. The checklist filled more than a page and I could check every box. Gary and I found humor in that. We laughed at many things that were not objectively funny, such as the time we were on our way home from the ER and nearly hit by a bull elk crossing the highway on a second such trip in two days.

Gary spent as much time with Mom as I did. He loved Mom and she loved him by then. I suspect neither of my parents believed he was good enough for me. More often I have recognized it was the other way around. It is the greatest luck in my life that Gary has shared it with me. We could care for Mom because we did it together.

Two Weeks is playing on television as I type, a film starring Sally Field as a mother dying while her four children struggle to come to terms during her final 14 days and immediately after.  I had never heard of the movie before today, but entire television series premiered and ended without our notice during those years Mom was dying. We certainly would not have been able to watch it in 2006 when it first came out. It is a touching film, but it misses the hardest part of losing a parent.

It is not the death or the two weeks before death or distributing the ashes. The dying is hard, the decisions about care are painful: the last words exchanged, her body in the hospital bed, hoping to reconcile with estranged family members (that never happened)—all so very painful.

Most novels and films and television programs collapse the process of grief—the shock and guilt, denial, anger and bargaining, and depression, all the way to acceptance and renewed hope so very fast, in a timeline of a few hours or days or pair of weeks. I wish that had been our experience.

We worked through years caring for my mother, and we needed years after, to adjust to the emptiness where a dear person used to reside.

That is hardest.

A GREAT POEM

I wanted to post this to Facebook, but I am not on Facebook.

FOR THE WHITE PERSON WHO WANTS
TO KNOW HOW TO BE MY FRIEND

Pat Parker

 

    The first thing you do is to forget that I’m black.
Second, you must never forget that I’m black.

You should be able to dig Aretha,
but don’t play her every time I come over.
And if you decide to play Beethoven—don’t tell me
his life story.  They make us take music appreciation, too.

Eat soul food if you like it, but don’t expect me
to locate your restaurants
or cook it for you.

And if some Black person insults you,
mugs you, rapes your sister, rapes you,
rips your house or is just being an ass—
please, do not apologize to me
for wanting to do them bodily harm.
It makes me wonder if you’re foolish.

And even if you really believe Blacks are better lovers than
whites—don’t tell me. I start thinking of charging stud fees.

In other words—if you really want to be my friend—don’t
make a labor of it.  I’m lazy.  Remember.
   From Movement in Black by Pat Parker.  Copyright(c) 1978 by Pat Parker.

IRRITATING DAY

mbp15touch-gray-select-201610_GEO_AE.jpeg

I won’t call it a “bad day” because no one I love died or is in the hospital or lost their job or anything momentous. It was not a cruel day or a day the weather was so ferocious that we didn’t get our walk. I walked a couple of miles. I showered this morning. My class did fairly well.

Subaru insists on sending me emails, though I have asked them seven times—as of last count—to please stop. I am still saying “please.”

Trump . . . well, I should be used to it by now. I refuse to let that freakish crank ruin my day.

It was not a “bad” day because the whole day was not bad. It was irritating because I had to talk to several automated voices and three people about my computer and none of them helped me.

The irritation is about my laptop, which I use on battery for about 12 hours every day. My “early 2013” MacBook Pro alerted me that I will “need a new battery soon” and we thought we’d take care of that tomorrow by driving into Portland to the Apple store.

My husband Gary insisted I call ahead to be certain they have the battery I need. Simple, right?

At this point I should probably mention that my last Apple laptop lasted for close to a decade and I burned through three or four batteries. Replacing them was simple: flip the closed laptop over, click open the battery cover, pop the old battery out, slide the new one in, replace the cover, and done. I did it myself each time in half a minute.

My new laptop has ten tiny screws in the back. I realized when I got it that I would need to take it in to have the battery replaced. I was not happy about that but I still was under the delusion that this would be simple because simplicity is the reason I have been loyal to Macs for going on 30 years. Someone would unscrew the back, pop the old battery out and slide the new one in, replace the cover and done.

Oh, no. It seems I need an appointment. They need to be certain they will have the battery I need. After passing through two sets of menus at the Apple national number and another set of automated voices locally, no one can reveal a thing about that battery. They “cannot release stocking information.” Do I live near a Best Buy—no. Can I go to my local Simply Mac—no such thing locally, but I tried calling them too. Bring it in so they can diagnose the problem and then order the battery? They each want my phone number, my email and name, the model and serial number of my Mac, but they either can’t order it until they have my laptop or can’t tell me whether they have the battery I need for my Mac.

They suggested I mail it in.

Well, no, my life is on this computer. I am not mailing it in.

Then I must make an appointment. In northern Oregon only two stores have available appointments, one at 6:30 pm Saturday and the other at 1:30 on Wednesday at another location. I do not object to the $126 price, but we are old people here. I can’t ask Gary to drive home in the dark on a Saturday night. I won’t do that myself. We are asleep by 8:30 on a Saturday night. And Wednesday I have to be at school. How about next week? I asked. No, Apple can’t make appointments more than 7 days out.

Seriously?

That little blue and green explosion on the screen above? That’s my patience right about now.

I never thought I would say it, but it might be time to jump brands.

. . . and the new Subaru. We admitted to one another today that the only way to open the hatch is with one electric key,—the other key does not have a hatch release button at all. There is no keyhole and no interior release for the hatch. So we’re fine unless the key battery dies.

 

SUNDAY SOUP

IMG_2100

This will post on a weekday, but it is Sunday as I begin writing. Vegetable parings from the past week are in my cast iron pot on the stove. I am filtering water to pour over onion skins and parsley stems—the trimmings of a week of cooking. It became a habit when I was working full time and both our sons were gone to make “Sunday soup” that would feed us for several days. I was too busy till Thursday to cook much of anything, and I needed lunches since like every teacher I know, I have a half hour for lunch.

We know that eating quickly is unhealthy, but the way. We’ve known this for a long time, and if you google “eating too fast impacts health” you will find well over two million hits. “Benefits of eating fast” will yield even more, except most of those articles tell you why you shouldn’t do it. “The benefits of slow eating include better digestion, better hydration, easier weight loss or maintenance, and greater satisfaction with our meals. Meanwhile, eating quickly leads to poor digestion, increased weight gain, and lower satisfaction.” I won’t go into fast food. We do not do fast food in my home.

So. On Sundays I make stock and then I make soup. Today I have some Parmesan rinds that will flavor my stock as if simmers for an hour. The stock will then be added to beans and maybe rice or pasta, fresh vegetables, and parsley at the end. Dinner. Half of the leftovers will likely be frozen and we will finish the rest in a day or so. In the mean time, I have curry frozen from last week, or pesto or chili makings. Food is important.

A seal is dying a few hundred yards north of our home. He was not there when we walked north yesterday, then he was working his way out of the water as we walked south. We called him in and the Seaside Aquarium sent someone to stake him out. Tourists sometimes want to “help.” There is no help.

I attended a writer’s retreat, my first time at The Flight of the Mind in 1996. During an open read, a woman told her story about visiting the Olympic Peninsula and finding a baby seal “abandoned” on the shore. She rescued the took it back to Seattle and eventually placed it with a business. She was lightly proud of herself for her selfless action.

The Marine Mammals Act of 1972 criminalized such act. It is against federal law to feed, interfere ,or cause to be interfered with any marine mammal, such as by allowing a dog to harass or chase or come too close to marine mammals. “The U.S. Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA) protects all marine mammals, including cetaceans (whales, dolphins, and porpoises), pinnipeds (seals and sea lions), sirenians (manatees and dugongs), sea otters, and polar bears within the waters of the United States.”

My father worked for the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries (then in the Department of the Interior), and he warned his children that mother seals often leave their infants onshore. The baby seal was not abandoned. It was resting. The woman stole an infant from its mother, and even in hindsight failed to appreciate that aside from violating the law, had deprived a mother of her child.

We cut our walk short this morning when we recognized the seal is still alive. Another local who is often out this time of day, snapped a leash on his day and took her off the beach. None of us are not hopeful it will live much longer, but we won’t add to its suffering.

The woman’s essay that had been published in The Seattle Times revealed she meant well. She was proud of her actions all those years ago. What she did was not kind, it was illegal. What she did was subject to civil penalties of up to $11,000 and up to a year in prison plus criminal fines. What she did destroyed a family and, worse, no one else recognized the heartlessness of her actions in time to stop her, regardless of her intentions. Too late for the seals. Too late.

ABOVE: A family of sea lions float on swells just off shore, basking in the sun, flippers up in the air. 

IMG_0001

The remains of a Sunday Soup. Carrots, sweet peppers, onion, celery, and rice.